最新的设计文档里面对这一块做了一个解释。

Why not use the syntax F like C++ and J***a? When parsing code within a function, such as v := F, at the point of seeing the < it's ambiguous whether we are seeing a type instantiation or an expression using the < operator. This is very difficult to resolve without type information. For example, consider a statement like a, b = w < x, y > (z) Withou…。

上一篇 : 大海捞针还捞着了是一种什么样的体验？
下一篇 : Rust 和 Go 的并发模型有什么不同，为什说 Rust 的并发模型更好 ？（1.0已没有内建模型？